Important: New Login Process

We've updated our access and security system. The first time you log in, enter your work email, and we'll guide you through the process.

  • If your organization uses Single Sign-On (SSO), you will be redirected to your company's login portal.
  • If you log in with a username and password, you will be prompted to set a new password before accessing your account.

Go to the Login Page to get started.

We appreciate your cooperation during this transition. If you need assistance, please call +1 650-552-4224 or email support@biocentury.com.

BioCentury
ARTICLE | Regulation

Seeking tort resistance

March 9, 2009 7:00 AM UTC

The immediate impact of last week's U.S. Supreme Court decision on preemption in Wyeth v. Levine will likely be to cause companies to revisit their drug labels to determine if new safety information should be added in an attempt to make them tort-proof - or at least more tort-resistant. In the long-term, this could pile more work onto an already over-taxed FDA and result in labels with many more warnings, no matter how tenuous the link between the drug and potential side effects.

The case began in 2000, when Diana Levine received Phenergan via IV push at her local health clinic for nausea associated with migraine. Shortly thereafter, she developed gangrene and her forearm was amputated. Levine sued her doctor and the clinic, who settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. She also sued Wyeth under state tort law for failing to properly warn of the dangers of IV push delivery of Phenergan. The Vermont courts awarded her $6.8 million...

Get Unlimited Access
Continue reading with a free trial.
Or Purchase This Article